Skip to content
770-587-4595

Money Transmission Licensing

Who Needs a Money Transmitter License?

If your business receives money from one party and moves it to another, holds customer balances, or sells stored value, money transmitter licensing analysis typically applies. This guide walks through the company types that most often trigger the requirement, the ones that usually do not, and the gray areas in between.

  • All 50 states
  • Specialist support
  • Human review on every filing

Talk to an expert

Tell us about your situation and we will follow up within one business day.

We never sell your information. A real person replies, usually within one business day.

Or start your application
Reviewed by Cornerstone Staff28 years of financial services state licensing experienceLast verified August 6, 2026

Money Transmission Licensing

Who needs a money transmitter license?

A business typically needs money transmitter licensing analysis when it receives money or monetary value from one party in order to transmit it to another, holds customer funds or balances even briefly, or sells stored value such as prepaid access. Company types that most often trigger the requirement include remittance services, crypto exchanges and custodial wallets, P2P payment apps, bill payment processors, currency exchangers, prepaid card program managers, marketplaces that hold seller or buyer funds, and payroll providers that take custody of employer money. Banks and other chartered institutions are generally exempt, and merchants accepting payment for their own goods are generally outside the definition. Because every state writes its own statute and exemptions, the answer for a specific business is a state-by-state legal determination, not a rule of thumb.

Does Every Business That Handles Payments Need a Money Transmitter License?
No. The requirement generally turns on whether you receive, hold, or transmit money on behalf of another person. Merchants accepting payment for their own sales, banks and chartered institutions, and software providers that never control funds are generally outside the requirement. Businesses that hold customer balances or move money between third parties typically are not.
Does Using a Bank Partner Mean I Do Not Need a License?
Not by itself. A bank partnership changes the flow of funds, and in some structures the bank's charter covers the regulated activity, but regulators look at who actually controls customer money at each step. Many partner-bank fintechs still hold their own money transmitter licenses. The account agreements and fund flows decide the analysis, so this is a structure to verify with counsel, not assume.

Money transmitter licensing by the numbers

US jurisdictions require a money transmitter license
51 of 52 US jurisdictions require a money transmitter license Source: state regulator statutes compiled in our state-law index, verified August 2026. Money transmitter license state laws
statutory surety bond range across licensing states
$10,000 to $1,000,000 statutory surety bond range across licensing states Source: state regulator statutes compiled in our state-law index, verified August 2026. Money transmitter license state laws

The Cornerstone Way

A repeatable method, from first filing to every renewal

Faster licenses, less effort on your side, fewer mistakes, and fewer headaches. It is the way we combine experienced specialists, intentional AI, and the Atlas platform across one sequenced process.

  1. Discover

    We connect you with independent attorneys to pin down which licenses you need.

  2. Prepare

    Your licensing specialist assembles each application; our software handles the repetitive work.

  3. Review

    That same specialist reviews every filing before it reaches a regulator.

  4. Approve

    We submit, track each application, and keep you posted until the license is granted.

  5. Renew

    We file every renewal ahead of its deadline in Atlas so licenses stay current.

Anyone can list five steps. Here is what makes ours hold up.

The shortcut

The common approach is to scrape the web for an answer and hope it is current. When the rules change, or the page was wrong to begin with, the mistake surfaces as a deficiency after the filing is in, when it costs the most time.

The Cornerstone Way

  • Specialists who know the answer

    Decades of licensing specialists, so the answer is right rather than guessed.

  • Trusted relationships with the regulator

    Direct, trusted relationships with regulators, so we ask the question instead of assuming the answer.

  • Living internal checklists

    Checklists that update the moment we learn something new, so deficiencies are caught before they happen.

99.995% On-time submissions in 2025. Filed correctly and on time, so you start operating sooner without avoidable back and forth.
See how it works

The Question Every Payments Company Has to Answer First

Money transmitter licensing is triggered by what your money flow does, not by what your industry calls itself. State statutes generally ask a version of the same question: does this business receive, hold, or transmit money or monetary value on behalf of another person? A payroll company and a crypto exchange can both answer yes, and a software company that never touches funds can answer no while its closest competitor answers yes. This page is general compliance information, not legal advice: whether your specific model requires licensing depends on your exact flow of funds and each state's statute, and we confirm classification with an independent licensing attorney before any filing.

Built for Your Business

Remittance Services

Sending money on behalf of customers, domestically or across borders, is the textbook activity money transmission statutes were written for. Remittance is generally the clearest licensing trigger of any model on this page.

  • Receiving funds from a sender for delivery to a recipient
  • Cross-border corridors add federal remittance-rule obligations
  • Agent networks require per-state agent reporting

Crypto Exchanges, Wallets & Stablecoins

Most states treat custody and transfer of digital assets as money transmission, and New York, Louisiana, and California layer dedicated virtual currency regimes on top.

  • Custodial control of customer assets is the key signal
  • Non-custodial software is treated differently in many states
  • BitLicense, Louisiana VCBL, and California DFAL add state-specific filings

P2P Payment Apps

Apps that move money between users, or hold user balances, generally sit squarely inside state transmission definitions, which is why the large P2P platforms hold licenses in nearly every state.

  • Stored balances are analyzed as held customer funds
  • Bank partnerships change, but rarely remove, the analysis
  • Volume thresholds rarely exempt a consumer app

Bill Payment Processors

Collecting money from consumers to pay their billers typically counts as receiving money for transmission, though agent-of-payee exemptions can change the answer state by state.

  • Flow of funds between consumer, processor, and biller drives the analysis
  • Agent-of-payee exemptions apply in some states, not all
  • Late or failed payments create consumer-protection exposure

Currency Exchangers

Exchanging one currency for another is regulated in many states under the same statutes as transmission, and currency dealing is its own FinCEN MSB category at the federal level.

  • Fiat-to-fiat exchange desks and kiosks are commonly covered
  • FinCEN currency dealer registration has its own thresholds
  • Some states license exchange separately from transmission

Prepaid Card Programs

Issuing or selling prepaid access, gift card programs, and general purpose reloadable cards generally brings stored-value provisions of state money transmission law into play.

  • Stored value is money transmission in most state statutes
  • Bank-issued programs shift, but do not erase, the analysis
  • Closed-loop exemptions cover some single-merchant programs

Marketplace Platforms

Marketplaces that hold buyer payments before releasing them to sellers typically face transmission analysis, and the payment processor exemption question is one of the most contested in payments.

  • Holding seller funds, even briefly, is the core signal
  • Payment facilitator structures change the analysis, not always the answer
  • Escrow-like flows draw separate state escrow statutes

Payroll Providers

Payroll companies that take custody of employer funds before paying employees or tax agencies are treated as money transmitters in a growing number of states.

  • Custody of employer funds between collection and payout is the trigger
  • Several states carve out payroll processing; several do not
  • Tax impound accounts get their own regulatory attention

How Do You Evaluate Whether Your Business Touches Money Transmission?

State statutes vary in wording, but regulators generally analyze the same handful of signals. Walking your actual flow of funds through these questions is the first step of every classification review we run.

Do you accept funds on behalf of a third party?

Receiving money from one person for the benefit of another is the core of nearly every state definition. If funds move from your customer through accounts you own or control to someone else, transmission analysis typically applies.

Do you take even temporary control of the money?

Duration rarely matters. Funds that sit in your account for minutes between collection and payout are generally analyzed the same way as funds held for weeks.

Do you hold balances, wallets, or stored value?

Customer balances that can be spent, sent, or cashed out later are stored value in most statutes, which is regulated alongside transmission.

Do your customers span multiple states?

Licensing follows where the customer lives, not where you are headquartered. A model that triggers licensing and serves a national market typically needs a license in nearly every state.

Who Generally Does Not Need a Money Transmitter License?

Some categories sit outside most state definitions, either by statutory exemption or because the activity is not transmission at all. Even here, the details matter: an exempt entity can still have a non-exempt affiliate, and an exempt activity can sit next to a covered one inside the same product.

Banks and chartered institutions

Banks, credit unions, and similarly chartered institutions are generally exempt from state money transmitter licensing because they are already supervised under their charters. The exemption typically covers the institution itself, not fintech partners operating on top of it.

Merchants selling their own goods and services

A business accepting payment for its own sales is generally not transmitting money for others. The analysis changes the moment the same business starts collecting funds owed to someone else.

Pure software providers that never control funds

A platform that only passes payment instructions, while a licensed processor or bank actually holds and moves the money, is generally outside the definition. The line is control of funds, and regulators look at the account agreements, not the marketing language.

True agents of the payee, in the states that recognize it

Many states exempt a party collecting money as the appointed agent of the person owed the money, because payment to the agent legally discharges the debt. The exemption's scope and paperwork requirements differ meaningfully by state.

What Are the Gray Areas and Common Exemptions?

The hardest classification questions live between the clear cases. These are the exemption angles that come up most often in our reviews, and every one of them is state-specific: an arrangement that is exempt in one state can require a license next door, which is why we treat exemption reliance as a documented, state-by-state legal conclusion rather than an assumption.

The agent-of-payee exemption is the most commonly attempted. It generally requires a written agency appointment from the payee and works only when payment to you legally extinguishes the payer's obligation. Payment processor exemptions are narrower than their name suggests: many states exempt processing only when the funds move through a regulated intermediary such as a bank, and holding funds in your own account can defeat the exemption. Marketplace and payment facilitator models raise both questions at once, and several states have issued guidance that reaches opposite conclusions on nearly identical facts. When a model genuinely straddles the line, the practical options are restructuring the flow of funds, partnering with a licensed transmitter, or licensing, and the right answer is a business decision made with counsel, not a default.

Does This Sound Like Your Business?

A quick self-check, not a verdict. If one or more of these describes your model, money transmission analysis typically belongs on your roadmap before launch, not after a regulator inquiry.

Customer money passes through accounts you control

Even briefly, and even when a bank partner sits underneath the product.

Users hold a balance inside your product

Wallets, stored credit, prepaid balances, or anything a customer can top up and spend later.

You pay out to someone other than the person who paid you

Sellers, billers, employees, landlords, beneficiaries abroad, or anyone else downstream.

Your customers live in more than one state

Licensing obligations follow the customer, so multi-state reach multiplies whatever answer the analysis produces.

You are relying on an exemption nobody has verified

If the words agent of the payee or payment processor exemption appear in your plans without a state-by-state legal memo behind them, that verification is the next step. Talk to us and we will scope the review.

What Does Licensing Involve if the Analysis Says Yes?

When a model does require licensing, the program has a known shape: state applications through NMLS, surety bonds, net worth minimums, a BSA and AML program, and FinCEN registration as a money services business. Our cost guide at /money-transmitter-license-cost breaks down the real state-by-state figures with an interactive estimator, our timeline guide at /money-transmitter-license-timeline shows how long each stage takes, and our state-by-state requirements hub at /mtl-state-laws covers every jurisdiction's statute, bond, and regulator. If the analysis instead lands on an exemption or a partnership structure, documenting that conclusion properly is just as important, because it is what you will show a regulator who asks.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Related Pages

Money Transmitter License Money Transmitter License Cost Money Transmitter License Timeline MSB Registration

Ready for licensing the Cornerstone way?

Anyone can file paperwork and hand you a license. Licensing the Cornerstone way is the same outcome done right: fewer deficiencies, a faster path to approval, less work on your plate, and renewals that stay managed long after you go live.

  • Right the First Time

    We prepare and file it correctly the first time, so most applications are accepted on the first submission instead of bouncing back with correction notices.

  • 25 to 30x

    faster than doing it yourself

    Faster to Licensed

    Start applications for 12 to 15 states on your own and it crawls. Hand those same states to a Cornerstone Licensing Specialist and they get you licensed 25 to 30 times faster, pursuing every state at once and knowing what each examiner expects.

  • 97-98.5%

    of the work handled for you

    Less Work for You

    You answer questions once, then Cornerstone generates and files the license. Your part is the few minutes it takes to confirm the details.

  • 99.995%

    on-time submissions in 2025

    Renewals That Stay Managed

    Every license, bond, and renewal date lives in Atlas and is tracked for you, so nothing lapses once you are approved.

See what the Cornerstone way means

Ready to Apply?

Start Your Application Now

Save and resume from any step. An expert reviews every submission within one business day.

Loading your application

Money transmitter regulations by state

Money transmitter regulations by state

We are refreshing our state-by-state summaries for money transmitter. Browse the states we have published below.

  • Alabama
    Regulator: Alabama Securities Commission
    License: yes
    Bond: Not less than $100,000, or the average daily outstanding money-received-for-transmission obligations in Alabama plus 50% of average daily outstanding payment-instrument and stored-value obligations in Alabama, whichever is greater; commission may raise to a maximum of $5,000,000
    Open Alabama guide Official regulator site
  • Alaska
    Regulator: Alaska Department of Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, Division of Banking and Securities
    License: yes
    Bond: $25,000 plus $5,000 for each location, not exceeding a total addition of $125,000 (base + additions); department may raise to a maximum of $500,000 based on financial condition
    Open Alaska guide Official regulator site
  • Arizona
    Regulator: Arizona Department of Insurance and Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $25,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Arizona (most recent three-month period), up to a maximum of $500,000; $25,000 if tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets
    Open Arizona guide Official regulator site
  • Arkansas
    Regulator: Arkansas Securities Department
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Arkansas (most recent three-month period), up to a maximum of $500,000; $100,000 if tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets
    Open Arkansas guide Official regulator site
  • California
    Regulator: California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI)
    License: yes
    Bond: $250,000 to $7,000,000 for receiving money for transmission; selling or issuing payment instruments or stored value carries a separate $500,000 to $2,000,000 bond, and the two are cumulative
    Open California guide Official regulator site
  • Colorado
    Regulator: Colorado Department of Regulatory Agencies, Division of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $250,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Colorado (most recent three-month period), up to a maximum of $1,000,000
    Open Colorado guide Official regulator site
  • Connecticut
    Regulator: Connecticut Department of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: Non-virtual-currency transmitters: not less than $300,000 (avg weekly transmissions < $300,000), $500,000 ($300,000-$500,000), or $1,000,000 (> $500,000); virtual-currency transmitters: amount set by the commissioner
    Open Connecticut guide Official regulator site
  • Delaware
    Regulator: Delaware Office of the State Bank Commissioner
    License: yes
    Bond: $25,000, plus $5,000 for each location in excess of one, not to exceed $250,000 total
    Open Delaware guide Official regulator site
  • District of Columbia
    Regulator: District of Columbia Department of Insurance, Securities and Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: $50,000, increased by $10,000 per additional location, not to exceed $250,000 total
    Open District of Columbia guide Official regulator site
  • Florida
    Regulator: Florida Office of Financial Regulation
    License: yes
    Bond: Amount specified by rule, but not less than $50,000 and not exceeding $2,000,000 (rule allows for financial condition, number of locations, and anticipated volume)
    Open Florida guide Official regulator site
  • Georgia
    Regulator: Georgia Department of Banking and Finance
    License: yes
    Bond: $250,000 minimum; the Department may require additional coverage, capped at $2,000,000
    Open Georgia guide Official regulator site
  • Hawaii
    Regulator: Department of Commerce and Consumer Affairs, Division of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: $100,000 for the initial 12 months of licensure; commissioner may increase up to a maximum of $500,000 based on impaired financial condition
    Open Hawaii guide Official regulator site
  • Idaho
    Regulator: Idaho Department of Finance
    License: yes
    Bond: $10,000, increased by $5,000 per additional location/authorized representative, up to a maximum of $500,000
    Open Idaho guide Official regulator site
  • Illinois
    Regulator: Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Illinois for the most recently completed quarter, capped at $2,000,000
    Open Illinois guide Official regulator site
  • Indiana
    Regulator: Indiana Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $300,000 or the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Indiana for the most recent calendar quarter, capped at $500,000
    Open Indiana guide Official regulator site
  • Iowa
    Regulator: Iowa Division of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Iowa for the most recent 3-month period, capped at $500,000
    Open Iowa guide Official regulator site
  • Kansas
    Regulator: Office of the State Bank Commissioner
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $200,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Kansas for the most recent 3-month period, capped at $1,000,000 (or $200,000 if tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets)
    Open Kansas guide Official regulator site
  • Kentucky
    Regulator: Kentucky Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: At least $500,000; commissioner may increase up to a maximum of $5,000,000 based on financial condition, net worth, or transaction volume
    Open Kentucky guide Official regulator site
  • Louisiana
    Regulator: Louisiana Office of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Minimum $100,000, up to a maximum of $500,000, or a higher amount deemed appropriate by the Commissioner up to a maximum of $1,000,000
    Open Louisiana guide Official regulator site
  • Maine
    Regulator: Bureau of Consumer Credit Protection
    License: yes
    Bond: $100,000
    Open Maine guide Official regulator site
  • Maryland
    Regulator: Office of the Commissioner of Financial Regulation
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $150,000 or 100% of the applicant's average daily money transmission liability in the State for the most recent quarter, capped at $2,000,000
    Open Maryland guide Official regulator site
  • Massachusetts
    Regulator: Massachusetts Division of Banks
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Massachusetts over the most recently completed three months, capped at $500,000
    Open Massachusetts guide Official regulator site
  • Michigan
    Regulator: Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS)
    License: yes
    Bond: $500,000 for the first location, plus $10,000 for each additional location and authorized delegate, up to a maximum of $1,500,000
    Open Michigan guide Official regulator site
  • Minnesota
    Regulator: Minnesota Department of Commerce
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Minnesota (most recent 3-month period), capped at $500,000
    Open Minnesota guide Official regulator site
  • Mississippi
    Regulator: Mississippi Department of Banking and Consumer Finance
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Mississippi (most recent 3-month period), capped at $500,000 (commissioner may raise up to $1,000,000)
    Open Mississippi guide Official regulator site
  • Missouri
    Regulator: Missouri Division of Finance
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Missouri (most recent 3-month period), capped at $500,000
    Open Missouri guide Official regulator site
  • Montana
    Regulator: Montana Division of Banking
    License: no
    Bond: Not required (no state license needed)
    Open Montana guide Official regulator site
  • Nebraska
    Regulator: Nebraska Department of Banking and Finance
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in Nebraska (most recent 3-month period), capped at $500,000
    Open Nebraska guide Official regulator site
  • Nevada
    Regulator: State of Nevada Department of Business and Industry, Financial Institutions Division
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Nevada (most recently completed quarter), capped at $500,000
    Open Nevada guide Official regulator site
  • New Hampshire
    Regulator: New Hampshire Banking Department
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in New Hampshire (most recent 3-month period), capped at $500,000
    Open New Hampshire guide Official regulator site
  • New Jersey
    Regulator: New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance
    License: yes
    Bond: Amount set by the Commissioner by regulation, not less than $100,000 and not more than $1,000,000 (money transmitter). Foreign money transmitters use a volume-based schedule starting at $25,000.
    Open New Jersey guide Official regulator site
  • New Mexico
    Regulator: New Mexico Regulation and Licensing Department, Financial Institutions Division
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $300,000 or 1% of the licensee's total yearly dollar volume of money transmission business in New Mexico (or projected first-year volume), up to a maximum of $2,000,000
    Open New Mexico guide Official regulator site
  • New York
    Regulator: New York State Department of Financial Services
    License: yes
    Bond: Set by the Superintendent of Financial Services for each licensee; New York Banking Law Article 13-B fixes no dollar amount, so confirm the required bond with DFS before relying on a figure
    Open New York guide Official regulator site
  • North Carolina
    Regulator: North Carolina Office of the Commissioner of Banks
    License: yes
    Bond: $150,000 base (transmission volume in NC up to $1,000,000); increases with NC transmission volume (e.g., $175,000, $200,000, and higher tiers)
    Open North Carolina guide Official regulator site
  • North Dakota
    Regulator: North Dakota Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of the licensee's average daily money transmission liability in North Dakota (most recent 3-month period), capped at $500,000
    Open North Dakota guide Official regulator site
  • Ohio
    Regulator: Ohio Department of Commerce, Division of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Security device (surety bond or permitted alternative) of not less than $300,000, up to a maximum of $2,000,000 as the Superintendent finds appropriate
    Open Ohio guide Official regulator site
  • Oklahoma
    Regulator: Oklahoma State Banking Department
    License: yes
    Bond: $50,000 plus $10,000 per authorized-delegate location, not exceeding a total of $500,000
    Open Oklahoma guide Official regulator site
  • Oregon
    Regulator: Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services, Division of Financial Regulation
    License: yes
    Bond: $25,000, increased by $5,000 per additional location/authorized delegate (amount otherwise set by rule/Director)
    Open Oregon guide Official regulator site
  • Pennsylvania
    Regulator: Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities
    License: yes
    Bond: Bond in the penal sum of $1,000,000 (department may require additional bond based on average daily outstanding transmission balance)
    Open Pennsylvania guide Official regulator site
  • Puerto Rico
    Regulator: Puerto Rico Office of the Commissioner of Financial Institutions (OCIF)
    License: yes
    Bond: $500,000 for a single office, increased by $10,000 per additional office or authorized agent (Commissioner may require a higher bond based on business volume/financial condition)
    Open Puerto Rico guide Official regulator site
  • Rhode Island
    Regulator: Rhode Island Department of Business Regulation, Division of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: $50,000 (currency transmission licensees); department may accept an alternative security form if a surety bond is not commercially available at reasonable cost
    Open Rhode Island guide Official regulator site
  • South Carolina
    Regulator: South Carolina Attorney General (Commissioner under the South Carolina Uniform Money Services Act)
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in South Carolina (most recent 3 months), capped at $500,000; alternatively $100,000 if tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets
    Open South Carolina guide Official regulator site
  • South Dakota
    Regulator: South Dakota Division of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in South Dakota (most recent 3 months), capped at $500,000; alternatively $100,000 if tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets
    Open South Dakota guide Official regulator site
  • Tennessee
    Regulator: Tennessee Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $50,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Tennessee (most recent calendar quarter), capped at $800,000
    Open Tennessee guide Official regulator site
  • Texas
    Regulator: Texas Department of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Texas (most recent 3 months), capped at $500,000; alternatively $100,000 if tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets
    Open Texas guide Official regulator site
  • Utah
    Regulator: Utah Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Flat minimum surety bond of $50,000
    Open Utah guide Official regulator site
  • Vermont
    Regulator: Vermont Department of Financial Regulation
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Vermont (most recent 3 months), capped at $2,000,000
    Open Vermont guide Official regulator site
  • Virginia
    Regulator: Virginia State Corporation Commission, Bureau of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Virginia for the most recent quarter, capped at $1,000,000; a flat $100,000 where tangible net worth exceeds 10% of total assets
    Open Virginia guide Official regulator site
  • Washington
    Regulator: Washington State Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Surety bond based on prior year's money transmission and payment instrument dollar volume; minimum $10,000, not to exceed $550,000
    Open Washington guide Official regulator site
  • West Virginia
    Regulator: West Virginia Division of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: $300,000 for money transmission; $100,000 for check or money-order sale or currency exchange; increased by 1% of annual West Virginia volume over $10 million, capped at $1,000,000
    Open West Virginia guide Official regulator site
  • Wisconsin
    Regulator: Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions
    License: yes
    Bond: Greater of $100,000 or 100% of average daily money transmission liability in Wisconsin (most recent 3 months), capped at $500,000
    Open Wisconsin guide Official regulator site
  • Wyoming
    Regulator: Wyoming Division of Banking
    License: yes
    Bond: $10,000 or 2.5 times outstanding payment instruments, whichever is greater, not to exceed $500,000
    Open Wyoming guide Official regulator site

Explore More From Our Team

Tools and references our customers use most.

Related

Coverage

Resources

Case study

Consumer Lender Cuts Annual Bond Premiums by 70% With One Compliance Partner

An established nationwide consumer lender consolidated licensing, bonds, insurance, and business services under Cornerstone, reduced its vendor overhead to a single partner, and cut annual bond premium costs by 70% throu

Regulatory Watch

Stay Ahead of the Rules

Recent rule changes, deadline announcements, and state agency updates we are tracking for you.

  • Watch Maryland Labor Department MD Aug 25, 2026

    Maryland Licensing Board Meeting

    Maryland's State Collection Agency Licensing Board conducted a meeting addressing licensing oversight and abusive practices.

    Read explainer
  • Action NYC DCA NY Aug 25, 2026

    NYC SHIELD Rule Compliance

    The NYC SHIELD Rule aimed for enhanced compliance requirements for debt collectors faced timing uncertainties for its effective start date.

    Read explainer
  • Action CFPB Aug 25, 2026

    CFPB Ends Publication of Consumer Complaint Narratives

    CFPB announced it would cease the discretionary publication of consumer complaint narratives and associated data visualizations.

    Read explainer
  • Action Washington DFI WA Aug 25, 2026

    Washington State Update on Money Services Industry

    Washington DFI issued an operational guidance update requiring money transmitter licensees to update records in NMLS by August 31, 2026.

    Read explainer
  • Action State Regulators (Multistate) Aug 25, 2026

    NewRez LLC Multistate Settlement

    A multistate settlement with NewRez LLC resulted in a $15. 5 million agreement over improper charge practices.

    Read explainer

Get a Straight Answer on Your Licensing Footprint

Tell us how money moves through your product. We will map your flow of funds against every state's requirements, with an independent licensing attorney confirming the classification, before you spend a dollar on filings.

Get started