Short answer
Compare on five things: industry depth in your specific license types, who actually does the work (named specialists versus a queue), what system of record you get, how renewals and ongoing filings are handled after the initial project, and what the provider will not do. A provider that names its boundaries is usually clearer about what it does well.
Licensing providers range from document-filing services to law firms to specialist firms. The filter that separates them fastest is specificity: ask which of your exact license types they filed last quarter, which states gave them trouble, and who by name would own your account. Generalists answer in averages; specialists answer in particulars.
Then look past the initial applications. Most of the lifetime cost of licensing is renewals, reports, bonds, and amendments, so ask what the ongoing operating model is, what platform tracks it, and what happens when a deadline is at risk. Finally, ask what they do not do. Cornerstone, for example, is deliberately U.S.-only, works only in regulated financial services, and is not a law firm; legal questions go to counsel. Boundaries like those tell you where a provider's depth actually is.
Related
More questions and answers
Browse more questions and answers.