Skip to content

Licensing

Monthly Debt Collection Complaints Decline

← All articles
Filed under Licensing

WebRecon reports an increase in year-to-date consumer litigation cases, but the Telephone Consumer Protection Act continues to produce low numbers.

Complaints to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau filed against debt collectors declined 10 percent from July to August, according to the latest debt collection litigation and complaint statistics report from WebRecon.

However, WebRecon CEO Jack Gordon wrote in the report that most of the change in complaints appears to be a result of a drop in data available from the CFPB.

The data often changes during the month - sometimes daily - based on the pace the CFPB releases complaint filing information.

There were 3,432 complaints in August 2015 compared to 3,812 in July. Consumers filed complaints about 834 different debt collectors and collection agencies responded to 92 percent (3,160 complaints) in a timely manner, according to the report.

The most reported consumer concern was being contacted about a debt they did not believe they owed (46 percent), followed by disclosure verification of a debt (18 percent) and communication tactics (15 percent).

The top five subissues in debt collection complaints were:

  • Debt is not mine (28 percent)
  • Debt was paid (12 percent)
  • Not given enough information to verify debt (12 percent)
  • Frequent or repeated calls (10 percent)
  • Attempted to collect wrong amount (6 percent)

The highest number of identifiable complaints was in the "other" category for expenses such as phone bills or health club memberships, with 1,065 complaints (31 percent) in that category last month, according to the report. Credit card debt resulted in 606 complaints (18 percent) and 577 (17 percent) complaints about medical debt.

Year-to-date complaint data increased 3 percent from 27,349 on Aug. 31, 2014 to 28,176 on August 2015.

"Once all the cases trickle in, that will likely be bumped up a few points," according to Gordon.

Consumer Litigation

About 1,220 consumer filed lawsuits under consumer statutes in August, according to the WebRecon report.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act cases declined 12.6 percent from July to August, however the year-to-date case filings are still on the rise. As of Aug. 31, 2015, there were 7,826 FDCPA cases, compared to 6,628 recorded at the same time last year.

Cases related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act remained the same from July to August 2015 - at 256. They increased by 1.7 percent from the 1,804 cases recorded on Aug. 31, 2014 to 1,835 cases as of Aug. 31, 2015.

Fair Credit Reporting Act Cases declined on a monthly basis but increased year-to-date.

The monthly decline from July to August was 2.3 percent. As of Aug. 31, 2015 there were 2,125 FCRA lawsuits compared to 1,606 as of Aug. 31, 2014 - a 32.3 percent increase.

Of the cases in August 2015, there were about 1,220 unique plaintiffs (including multiple plaintiffs in one suit.) Of those plaintiffs, about 414 (or 34 percent) had sued under consumer statutes before.

About 805 different companies were sued, according to Gordon. He also reports that 167 (18.1 percent) of the FDCPA cases, 35 of the TCPA cases (13.7 percent) and 31 (10.3 percent) of the FCRA cases were class action lawsuits.

Follow ACA on Twitter @ACAIntl or Facebook for news and event updates. ACA's LinkedIn Group includes news updates, member discussions, event promotions, jobs and more. Visit the group page and request to join today.

Found This Useful? Let's Get You Set Up.

Start an application and an expert will tailor the next steps to your situation.

Related reading

Licensing

Note-on-Note Financing Explained: Borrowing Against Your Notes

Note-on-note financing is how note investors recycle capital without selling. The facilities are lightly licensed by name, but regulated at every edge.

Licensing

Buying Mortgage Notes From Banks: How It Works and What to Check

Banks sell notes to manage capital and clean up balance sheets. Buying them is the easy part; the diligence and the licensing plan are what separate professionals.

Licensing

Performing vs Non-Performing Notes: The Compliance Difference

The price discount on non-performing notes is compensation for work, and much of that work is regulated. Here is how the licensing analysis splits between the two.

Licensing

Mortgage Note Investing for Beginners: The Licensing Side Nobody Explains

Most beginner guides cover yield math and due diligence. Almost none explain when buying a mortgage note makes you a regulated lender, servicer, or debt collector.

Defaulted Mortgage Loans and Licensing Risk

Licensing

Defaulted Mortgage Loans and Licensing Risk

As residential mortgage loans move from performing to non-performing status, the rules change in ways mortgage professionals cannot ignore. Servicing a current loan and managing a delinquent one are treated very differently under federal and state law, especially on licensing. This article breaks down the licensing triggers that arise when loans default.

Mortgage Servicer Licenses and Beyond: What Secondary Market Participants Must Know

Licensing

Mortgage Servicer Licenses and Beyond: What Secondary Market Participants Must Know

Mortgage industry executives and risk officers must work through a patchwork of state licensing rules in the secondary market for mortgage loans. Unlike loan originators, secondary market participants such as mortgage note buyers, loan servicers, and investors often face less obvious licensing triggers. Recent regulatory developments point to expanded oversight of post-origination activity.

Browse the full insights library, meet our editorial team, or download our whitepapers.

Insights

Found This Useful? Let's Get You Set Up.

An expert will respond within one business day.