Skip to content

Licensing

Adjusting Procedures for Deceased Consumers

Adjusting Procedures for Deceased Consumers By: Caren D. Enloe Section 1692a(3) defines a consumer as any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay a consumer debt. The final debt collection rule interprets the definition of a consumer to include deceased natural consumers, as well. Looking towards a November 30th effective date, here are some

← All articles
Caren Enloe

By Caren Enloe

Partner, Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers, L.L.P.

3/16/2021

Filed under Licensing

a person holding a paper

Adjusting Procedures for Deceased Consumers

By: Caren D. Enloe

Section 1692a(3) defines a consumer as any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay a consumer debt. The final debt collection rule reads the definition of a consumer to include deceased natural consumers as well. With a November 30th effective date ahead, here are some key items that may call for changes to your policies and procedures.

Initial Skip Traces

Because the Rule now addresses communications about deceased consumers, review your skip trace policies. Make sure they give the debt collector enough information about the deceased consumer's estate. Collection agencies should examine their skip trace policies and procedures to confirm they adequately identify estates and the representatives of those estates wherever possible. According to the CFPB, acceptable ways to identify estates include a search of public records and the use of location information communications.

Location Information

The Rule lets debt collectors seek location information about persons authorized to act on behalf of the deceased consumer's estate. Neither the FDCPA nor the Rule allows the debt collector to disclose the debt. Even so, the Rule's Official Commentary gives directed guidance on what content is acceptable in location information communications.

For deceased consumers, the Comments indicate a debt collector may state: "that the debt collector is seeking to identify and locate the person who is authorized to act on behalf of the deceased consumer's estate" or "that the debt collector is seeking to identify and locate the person handling the financial affairs of the deceased consumer." See Comment 10(b)(2)-1. Collection agencies should consider adding this language to their skip tracing and location inquiries.

It is not a per se safe harbor, but following the language of the comments provides some persuasive authority for compliance.

Debt Validation Notice

For debt validation, the Rule makes clear that if the debt collector knows or should know that the consumer is deceased, and has not previously provided the validation notice to the deceased consumer, the collector must provide the notice to a person authorized to act on behalf of the deceased consumer's estate. Under the CFPB's interpretation, this includes executors, administrators, and personal representatives.

The "should know" standard should give debt collectors pause. They should consider what tools they have that would or should let them know a consumer is deceased. Debt collectors should set policies and procedures that address when and to whom a debt validation notice should be sent when the consumer is deceased. They should also set processes for identifying estates and the appropriate representative of the estate.

Debt collectors should be mindful of the specificity required when sending validation notices to the representative of a deceased consumer. Comment 34(a)(1)-1 requires the debt collector to identify by name the person authorized to act on behalf of the deceased person. It is not enough to address the debt validation to the "Estate of John Smith." Instead, the debt collector must identify the specific person authorized to act on behalf of the estate and, where the notice has not previously been provided, send it addressed to the appropriate representative.

Permissive Parties for Communication

For all other communications, and consistent with this broad reading of who is a consumer, the Rule also includes as permissive third parties the deceased consumer's spouse, parent (if the consumer is a minor), legal guardian, executor or administrator, and confirmed successor in interest (as defined in Regulation X). The Comments further clarify that the terms "executor" and "administrator" include less formal personal representatives.

See Comment 6(a)(4)-1. "Persons with such authority may include personal representatives under the informal probate and summary administration procedures..., persons who sign declarations or affidavits to effectuate the transfer of estate assets, and persons who dispose of the deceased consumer's financial assets or other assets of monetary value extrajudicially." Collection agencies should note this clarification.

They should begin reviewing their policies, procedures, and scripts to see whether these are thorough enough to identify such parties.

Summary of Actions for Preparedness

Because the Rule takes a broader view of who is a consumer, collection agencies should begin reviewing their policies, procedures, scripts, and letter contents. The goal is to communicate properly with the appropriate representatives of estates. Skip tracing and location contacts should be updated to identify deceased consumers and those authorized to act on behalf of the estate.

Debt validation notices should be updated to reach the appropriate named representative of the estate. Finally, policies and procedures should be updated to identify the appropriate third parties for further communications about the debt when the consumer is deceased.

Found This Useful? Let's Get You Set Up.

Start an application and an expert will tailor the next steps to your situation.

Related reading

Licensing

Note-on-Note Financing Explained: Borrowing Against Your Notes

Note-on-note financing is how note investors recycle capital without selling. The facilities are lightly licensed by name, but regulated at every edge.

Licensing

Buying Mortgage Notes From Banks: How It Works and What to Check

Banks sell notes to manage capital and clean up balance sheets. Buying them is the easy part; the diligence and the licensing plan are what separate professionals.

Licensing

Performing vs Non-Performing Notes: The Compliance Difference

The price discount on non-performing notes is compensation for work, and much of that work is regulated. Here is how the licensing analysis splits between the two.

Finding Shelter in the Storm

Licensing

Finding Shelter in the Storm

Using the Bona Fide Error Defense with the Final Debt Collection Rule By: Caren D. Enloe The FDCPA provides a bona fide error defense for debt collectors who can show by a preponderance of the evidence that their violation was not intentional and resulted from a bona fide error notwithstanding the maintenance of procedures reasonably [...]

Crucial Conversations for a Smooth Transition to Reg. F

Licensing

Crucial Conversations for a Smooth Transition to Reg. F

Crucial Conversations for a Smooth Transition to Reg. F By Caren D. Enloe With the CFPB having decided to leave the effective date of the Debt Collection Rule as November 30th, the push is on for debt collectors to ensure their compliance with the Rule by that date. As debt collectors make the final push [...]

Reconciling the "Rule" Requirements with State Requirements

Licensing

Reconciling the "Rule" Requirements with State Requirements

Reconciling the "Rule" Requirements Where the Rubber Meets the Road By Caren D. Enloe For the past year, the industry's attention has been focused on the Debt Collection Rule (the "Rule"), its changes, and the new expectations it will place on debt collectors; but as the rubber meets the road, collection agencies and other debt [...]

Browse the full insights library, meet our editorial team, or download our whitepapers.

Insights

Found This Useful? Let's Get You Set Up.

An expert will respond within one business day.