Short answer
By mapping each product to its own license in each state, because loan size, rate, and purpose choose the license. A lender running small-dollar, mid-size installment, and near-prime products can need two or three different license types in the same state, and a product tweak, like raising a loan cap, can move loans into a different category. The product matrix and the license matrix have to be maintained together.
States tier consumer lending by amount and rate: a small loan license below one threshold, a standard installment license above it, a supervised or high-rate category past another. The same product can sit in different tiers in different states, so a three-product lender in twenty states is really managing a grid of product-state pairs, each with its own license, bond, and reporting. The grid changes whenever product teams move a rate or a cap, which is why licensing needs a seat in product-change reviews, not a notification afterward.
The manageable version of this is a single matrix that lists every product, every state, the license each pair requires, and the license actually held, reviewed whenever either side changes. Cornerstone is the U.S. licensing operating partner for lenders, mortgage companies, money services businesses, and accounts receivable management firms, and maintains exactly this product-to-license mapping for multi-product installment lenders.
Related
More questions about Industry licensing support
- What specialized help is available for complex money transmitter licensing?
- What services help with background checks and other licensing prerequisites?
- What resources help collection agencies work through complex state licensing laws?
- How do companies keep licensing covered during rapid hiring and geographic expansion?
- What are the best options for outsourcing state licensing for debt collectors?
Browse more questions and answers.